Today I looked at an article by Jeff Jeffrey about censorship hurting one’s cognitive processes. He was very adamant in his thoughts and ideas. His writing was full of emotion. He would be in complete opposition to the article from Wendy Day about protecting students from evils presented to them in books.
Jeff Jeffrey claims that when people are not allowed to explore novels they never learn new ideas about life.
“I respect parents who choose, after careful consideration, to keep their children from reading something that may cause them to grow up more quickly than they prefer. But I disagree with them. Reading and studying the written word is an inherently beautiful process. It exposes a person to a broad spectrum of ideas that would otherwise remain hidden and allows for the development of analytical reasoning. A child who reads, even when tackling books that may be difficult or contain harsh ideas, will inevitably become a more intelligent and more well-rounded person than one who does not.”
I tend to agree with Jeffrey on this. I remember when I was younger and would read novels that were advanced for my age. The crude words and sexual situations went right over my head. I have often returned to a book that I read when I was younger and I am amazed at the language and situations that I now understand. When I read Lord of the Flies for the first time I was ten years old and I enjoyed the book as a adventure novel about boys being boys. When I read it again for my high school 20th Century Literature course I remember being amazed at the pure brutality of the novel and there were so many Christian symbols that I had missed. However, even when I was ten I caught the message of the book about humanity.
I believe that banning people from books holds them back from opportunities to learn and will make students angry and give up on reading all together. Their mentality will be, “If I can’t read what I want to read then why read at all?” Jeffery agrees with me and takes it a step further.
“Censorship in all forms is a dangerous proposition, and one that must be guarded against. When librarians attempt to stifle students’ access to literature, they are essentially unraveling [their] educational outlooks and teaching [them] that it is OK for someone outside of their family to control their thoughts.”
He takes censorship from a mere guarding of students’ minds to a complete control of their thoughts. Here is where I differ from Jeffrey. I do think that censorship keeps students from some important truths about life and I think that it discourages reading. However, saying that because we allow books to be censored we allow others to control our thoughts is a little far-fetched.
I do believe that we need to put books in the hands of students and that if a ten year old girl wants to read Lord of the Flies then let her take up the challenge! Who cares if it has a few violent moments? I say “Let our youth learn and discover the world through books!”
Jeff Jeffrey. “Book banning destroys thought.” The Daily Reveille. Jan.24, 2007